世界中医药

作者	单位
冯丽鹏1，2，李国栋1，李峨1，狄波2，杜新亮2	1 中国中医科学院广安门医院，北京，100053； 2 中国中医科学院研究生院，北京，100072

摘要点击次数: 780

全文下载次数: 977

中文摘要:

背景：由中国中医科学院研究生院组织硕、博士生共16人，于2015年7月12日至8月9日，远赴欧洲奥地利维也纳、萨尔茨堡、法国巴黎、德国柏林、海德堡、卢森堡、比利时布鲁塞尔、意大利威尼斯、捷克布拉格、荷兰阿姆斯特丹等地进行了中医药交流并做实地调研。目的：通过中奥-欧盟暑期交流平台，调查欧洲各国家各地区、以及交流团队中其他学校成员（国内外）对针灸治疗便秘的认知度，并将结果进行梳理分析。方法：采用电子版本的自填式问卷调查法对普通人群进行调查。结果：我们获得游学期间80份调查问卷和同期国内的72份调查问卷。1）对针灸了解与否：欧洲组有119%的人了解针灸，而中国组有789%（与同期国内组79%相当），2组之间差异有统计学意义（P<005）；2）知道针灸治疗便秘与否：欧洲组有71%的人知道，而中国组有737%（与同期国内组56%相比有很大的差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（P<005）；3）如果便秘，您接受针灸治疗吗？欧洲组有48%的人接受，而中国组有526%（与同期国内组65%相比有些许的差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（P<005）；4）如果便秘更倾向于选择哪种方式A选择西药欧洲组有762%，而中国组有289%（与同期国内组10%相比有明显差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（P<005）；B选择中草药欧洲组有48%，而中国组有237%（与同期国内组60%相比有明显差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（P<005）；C选择针灸欧洲组有48%，而中国组有289%（与同期国内组12%相比有明显差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（P<005）；D选择其他方式欧洲组有143%，而中国组有184%（与同期国内组18%相当），2组之间差异有统计学意义（P<005）。结论：整理分析数据后我们初步得出，在欧洲一些国家和地区普通人群对于针灸治疗便秘的认知度较低，中医针灸知识在欧洲的推广还需我们做进一步的努力。

English Summary:

To investigate the degree of cognition on acupuncture used for constipation in Vienna, Salzburg in Austria, Paris in France, Berlin and Heidelberg in Germany, Brussels in Belgium, Luxembourg, Venice in Italy, Prague in the Czech Republic, Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Methods: Electronic questionnaires were adopted for the survey in ordinary citizens. Results: Eighty questionnaires were collected at abroad and 72 questionnaires were collected in China. 1) Whether know acupuncture or not: 11.9% in Europe Group knows acupuncture, and 78.9% was in China Group (similar to the corresponding data in China, 79%), showing significant difference between the two groups(P<005). 2) Whether know acupuncture being used for constipation: Europe Group was 7.1%, and China Group was 73.7% (different from corresponding data in China, 56%) , with significant difference between the two groups (P<005); 3)Will you try acupuncture if had constipation: 4.8% in Europe Group will try, and 52.6% in China Group (a slight difference from the corresponding data in China, 65%), which indicated significant difference between the two groups (P<005). 4) For constipation, you would prefer: In Europe Group 76.2% chose Western medicine, and 28.9% in China Group (different from the corresponding data in China 10%) with significant difference between the two groups (P<005); 4.8% in Europe Group might choose Chinese herbs, and 23.7% in Group China (different from the corresponding data in China 60%), and there was significant difference between the two groups (P<005). 4.8% in Europe Group chose acupuncture and 28.9% in China Group (different from the corresponding data in China 12%), with significant difference between two groups (P<005); 14.3% in Europe Group chose to use other methods and 18.4% in China Group (similar to corresponding data in China, 18%), and there was significant difference between the two groups (P<005). Conclusion: There is still a large space for developing and disseminating the culture about acupuncture in European countries.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器