中医综合治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床疗效评价研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

本课题为中国中医科学院第二批优势病种项目资助课题(编号:CACMS07Y0022)


Study on Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Inflammation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:评价中医综合治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床综合疗效,探讨基于症状变化的中医证候疗效评价方法。方法:将慢性盆腔炎患者121例随机分成中医综合治疗组、西药组,比较各组的综合疗效及证候疗效情况。结果:中医综合治疗组总有效率95.8%,西药组总有效率86%,2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。症状等级分组资料的H检验结果表明气滞血瘀型中医综合治疗组(中医组)显著优于西药组(P<0.05)。湿热瘀结型中医组与西药组的差异无统计学意义。结论:中医综合治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床疗效确切,采用症状等级分组资料H检验可能为一种更好的疗效评价方法。

    Abstract:

    To evaluate clinical efficacy of integrated TCM Treatment for Chronic pelvic inflammation, and explore efficacy evaluation methodology.Methods:121 patients of chronic pelvic inflammation were randomly divided into integrated traditional Chinese medicine treatment group, western medicine group. Overall efficacy and symptoms were evaluated and compared.Results:Total effective rate of TCM group was 95.8%, compared to 86% of western medicine group (P>0.05). H test showed the subtype of qi stagnation and blood stasis in TCM group was better than western medicine group at relieving symptoms (P<0.05), the type of damp heat and blood stasis in TCM group was not significantly better than the Western medicine group in relieving symptoms .Conclusion:Integrated traditional Chinese medicine treatment is effective for treatment of chronic pelvic inflammation, H test with symptoms rating and categorization is a recommendable methodology for efficacy evlauation

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

丁永芬 程 玲 王志国.中医综合治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床疗效评价研究[J].世界中医药,2013,8(11).

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-24
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-12-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码