不同强度电针抑制带状疱疹后神经痛的量效分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

湖北省卫生厅项目(编号:2013Z-Y50)——电针夹脊穴对带状疱疹神经痛镇痛作用和体液免疫功能的影响,课题负责人:毛红蓉


Comparison of Analgesia Effects of Electric Acupuncture at Different Intensities on Postherpetic Neuralgia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较不同强度电针抑制带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效。方法:将带状疱疹后神经痛患者91例随机分为3组,3组患者均给予电针治疗,但电针刺激强度随机分别设定为1 mA、3 mA、5 mA,共治疗15 d,比较各组患者治疗前、后疼痛视觉模拟评分、情绪评分变化、及综合疗效。结果:在第7次和第15次电针治疗后,3 mA和5 mA电针组疼痛视觉模拟评分、情绪评分、综合疗效明显低于1 mA电针组(P<0.05、P<0.01),而3 mA和5 mA电针组组间疼痛视觉模拟评分、情绪评分、综合疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:电针抑制带状疱疹后神经痛并不是强度越大越好,当电针强度达到3 mA时即可发挥满意疗效。

    Abstract:

    To compare the effect of electric acupuncture(EA) at different intensities on patients with postherpetic Neuralgia(PHN).Methods: We randomly divided 91 PHN patients into three groups, treated them with EA at different intensities for 15 times. The intensities of EA of three groups were set at 1 mA,3 mA,5 mA respectively. The visual analogous scale(VAS), emotional scale (ES), and comprehensive curative effects of EA of the three groups were observed before and after treatment. Results: After the treatment by EA for 7 and 15 times, the VAS, ES scores and the comprehensive curative effect of 3 mA and 5 mA group were lower than those of 1 mA group (P<0.05、P<0.01),but there were no significant differences between the 3 mA and 5 mA group(P>0.05).Conclusion: There is no better effect of intensifying the EA current in treating PHN; Current at 3 mA has the most satisfactory performance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

余玲玲,毛红蓉,万媛,周小勇.不同强度电针抑制带状疱疹后神经痛的量效分析[J].世界中医药,2015,10(09).

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-09-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码