Abstract:To observe the effect of local skin temperature and the remote skin temperature on PC8 acupoint under two different irradiations of synchronous pulse beam (the stimulus frequency was associated with the pulse of figure provided by biological information feedback infrared therapeutic apparatus)and continuous illumination on surface microcirculation (finger pulse), and to discuss whether the energy utilization of synchronous pulse radiation on surface microcirculation (finger pulse) is better than the continuous illumination. Methods:A total of 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups:synchronous pulse group and continuous irradiation group, 30 patients in each group, and then we observed the effects of different exposure modes on skin temperature, finger pulse microcirculation, and heart rate at 1 minute intervals for local (peripheral umbilicus and right elbow) and distal right palm (PC8). Results:The skin temperature and palmar skin temperature of the two groups rose significantly (P<0.01), but the temperature of local skin in the synchronized pulse group was (3.53±1.39)℃, which was significantly lower than that in the continuous irradiation group (4.62±1.38)℃, P<0.01). After 15 minutes of irradiation the skin temperature of the right hand palm (PC8) was (1.45±1.07)℃, which was higher than that of the continuous irradiation group (1.08±1.00)℃, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). Elbow irradiation result was similar to periumbilical irradiation result. Conclusion:By contrast, surface skin microcirculation (finger pulse) synchronous pulsation of the local skin temperature is lower, that it created the conditions to achieve “adequate moxibustion amount”. The skin temperature was higher at the distal palm, and that can promote the human body microcirculation. The experimental results show that the synchrotron pulsed irradiation method of bioinformation feedback infrared therapeutic apparatus is superior to the continuous irradiation method.