刘完素李东垣火热证认识之异同
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国中医科学院广安门医院学科培育基金项目(2009S217)


Similarities and Differences of Fire Heat Syndrome by Liu Wansu and Li Dongyuan
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本文通过对刘完素和李东垣2位医家在脾胃病火热证的认识进行比较,二者对脾胃病火热证论述各有侧重,刘完素偏重六气火化致病,治宜开达玄府,宣通气液;李东垣注重脾胃内伤,治疗多补中益气、升阳散火。从而增加我们对脾胃病火热证的进一步认识,为以后的临床提供治疗思路。

    Abstract:

    This paper compared the understandings of fire heat syndrome in spleen and stomach disease by Liu Wansu and Li Dongyuan. Both of them have different emphasis on fire heat syndrome in spleen and stomach disease. Liu Wansu thought that transformation of six qi into fire caused disease, and the treatment should open sweat pores, diffuse and smooth qi and fluid. Li Dongyuan thought the internal damage of spleen and stomach caused the disease, and the treatment should supplement the center and boost qi, raise yang and dissipate fire. These will increase our understanding of fire heat syndrome of spleen and stomach disease, so as to provide treatment ideas in clinical practice.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈瀚宇.刘完素李东垣火热证认识之异同[J].世界中医药,2018,(05).

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-07
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-06-04
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码