电针对乳腺癌小鼠抑瘤作用的时间窗及其免疫学机制的初步观察
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(82004460);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(ZZ13-YQ-070-C1)


Time Window of Tumor-suppressive Effect of Electroacupuncture at ST36 on Breast Cancer-bearing Mice and Its Immunological Mechanism:A Preliminary Study
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察肿瘤不同发展阶段电针干预对乳腺癌荷瘤小鼠肿瘤生长速度的影响,明确电针“足三里”抑瘤的最佳干预时间窗,并初步探讨电针抑瘤的免疫学机制。方法:BALB/c小鼠随机分为正常组、模型组、阳性药组、电针1组、电针2组、电针3组和电针4组。原位接种4T1-luc细胞制备乳腺癌小鼠模型。对各电针组小鼠双侧“足三里”行电针干预(0.1 mA,2/15 Hz,30 min),阳性药组腹腔注射吉西他滨。选取正常组、模型组、电针3组、电针4组和阳性药组进行重复验证实验。采用游标卡尺和活体成像系统评估肿瘤尺寸;流式细胞术检测外周血抗肿瘤免疫细胞CD8+T和自然杀伤细胞比例。结果:第16天、19天和22天,阳性药组、电针4组和电针3组小鼠肿瘤尺寸较模型组明显减小(P<0.05或P<0.01),且持续至观察结束。电针4组和阳性药组小鼠肿瘤重量较模型组明显减轻(P<0.05或P<0.01)。重复验证实验表明电针4组较电针3组抑瘤作用强,但差异无统计学意义。且电针3组和电针4组均可提高荷瘤小鼠外周血中CD8+T和自然杀伤细胞比例,以电针4组作用更加明显。结论:成瘤后电针干预的抑瘤效果最好,且电针“足三里”可能通过提高抗肿瘤免疫应答减缓乳腺癌荷瘤小鼠肿瘤的生长速度。

    Abstract:

    To compare the suppressive effect of electroacupuncture(EA) at different stages of tumor development on tumor growth in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice,and clarify the optimal time window for tumor suppression by EA at ST36,to investigate the immunological mechanism of EA in treating tumors.Methods:BALB/c mice were randomly divided into control,model,positive and EA groups.According to the time window of EA intervention,EA groups were divided into 4 groups(EA1,EA2,EA3 and EA4).The orthotopic breast cancer model was established by implantation of 4T1-luc cells in the second breast pair on the right side of mice.EA(0.1 mA,2/15 Hz) was applied to bilateral ST36 for 30 min,once every other day.Mice in the positive group were intraperitoneally injected with gemcitabine.The experiment was repeated and verified in control,model,EA3,EA4 and positive groups.Vernier calipers and live imaging system were used to determine the tumor size.The proportions of CD8+T cells and natural killer(NK) cells in the blood were detected by flow cytometry.Results:The tumor size in positive,EA4 and EA3 groups were decreased compared with the condition in model group at 16 d,19 d and 22 d separately(P<0.05 or P<0.01),and the tumor-suppressive effect lasted to the end of observation.The tumor weight of EA4 and positive groups was lower than that in model group(P<0.05 or P<0.01).Repeated experiment indicated that EA4 group displayed a stronger suppressive effect on tumor growth than EA3 group but with no significant difference.Compared with the condition in control group,the proportion of CD8+T cell and NK cell in the blood was reduced in model group,while the proportion was increased in EA3 and EA4 groups,and the mice in EA4 group had a higher proportion of CD8+T cell and NK cell in the blood.Conclusion:EA intervention after tumor formation displayed the strongest tumor-suppressive effect,which might be related to its improved anti-tumor immunity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

万红叶,张知云,张晓宁,于清泉,孙小月,何伟,王晓宇,阚宇,景向红.电针对乳腺癌小鼠抑瘤作用的时间窗及其免疫学机制的初步观察[J].世界中医药,2022,(21).

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-12-12
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码