To comprehensively evaluate the literature quality of systematic reviews/Meta analysis on acupotomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation by radar graph，so as to provide reference for Meta analysis and development of clinical treatment scheme.Methods:The database was searched by computer to obtain comprehensive literature.The rank of articles was calculated from the six dimensions of “year of publication”“type of included studies”“AMSTAR-2 score”“PRISMA score”“test of publication bias” and “homogeneity”，and finally the radar graph was made for multiple evaluation of articles.Results:Nine articles were included，and the average scores of the six dimensions were 5.22，6.78，5.22，5.67，8.11，and 8.11，respectively.The radar chart showed that the ranks two papers published in 2018 and 2016 were the highest，and the radar graph areas were large; the rank of one paper published in 2010 was the lowest，and the radar graph area was small.Conclusion:The ranks of included papers ranged from 27 to 52，and the higher the rank，the greater the reference significance of the paper.Main reasons for the different quality of literature are that there is no advance plan for the research，the literature retrieval and screening are not standardized，the reasons for the types of included studies are not explained，the bias risk of included studies is not properly considered，and the possible conflict of interest is not mentioned.The above problems lead to low ranks and poor reference significance.Although the meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate of acupotomy was better than that of other treatments(P<0.05)，the quality of literature was poor，and high-quality evidence is still needed to confirm whether Acupotomy is more effective than other treatments.