以参苓咀嚼片提取工艺探究中心组合响应面法与正交试验法的区别
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(81973482)


Difference Between Central Composite Design Response Surface Methodology and Orthogonal Design in the Extraction Process of Shenling Chewable Tablets
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:分别应用中心组合设计-响应面法与正交试验,结合层次分析法(AHP)-熵权法(EWM)优化中药复方的提取工艺,为中药提取试验方法的优选提供依据。方法:以葛根素、橙皮苷、甘草苷转移率及复方出膏率的综合评分为响应值,以加水倍数、提取时间、提取次数为关键工艺参数,采用AHP-EWM法确定各种评价指标的权重系数,并进行综合评分,以中心组合响应面法及正交试验分别设计优化提取工艺参数,并进行验证与比较。结果:以参苓咀嚼片的提取工艺为例,分别采取正交试验法与响应面法得出的最佳工艺不同,但3批验证实验相对标准差(RSD)均小于3.0%,综合评分接近各自试验预测值。结论:响应面法工艺优选设计相对精细,但重复性和可操作性好,较正交试验更精细,更适合参苓咀嚼片的生产实际提取。

    Abstract:

    To optimize the extraction process of Chinese medicine compound formulas using both central composite design-response surface methodology(CCD-RSM) and orthogonal design,in combination with the analytic hierarchy process-entropy weight method(AHP-EWM),and to provide a reference for selecting optimal Chinese medicine extraction methodologies.Methods:The comprehensive score,based on the transfer rates of puerarin,hesperidin,and liquiritin,as well as the extract yield,was used as the response value.Water-to-material ratio,extraction time,and number of extractions were selected as key process parameters.The AHP-EWM was applied to determine the weight coefficients of each evaluation index and calculate the comprehensive score.Both CCD-RSM and orthogonal design were used to optimize the extraction parameters,followed by experimental validation and comparison.Results:Using the extraction process of Shenling Chewable Tablets as a case study,the optimal extraction conditions obtained by the orthogonal design and the response surface methodology were different.However,in both methods,the relative standard deviations(RSD) of three validation batches were all below 3.0%,and the comprehensive scores closely matched the predicted values from each respective design.Conclusion:The response surface methodology offers more refined process optimization with good reproducibility and operability,making it more suitable than the orthogonal design for practical production of Shenling Chewable Tablets.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴承潮,陆丽蓉,钟绍辉,鲁方奇,郑云枫,刘陶世,程建明.以参苓咀嚼片提取工艺探究中心组合响应面法与正交试验法的区别[J].世界中医药,2025,(05).

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-04
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码