电头针对局灶性脑缺血大鼠皮质区缺血性损伤的治疗作用机制
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(81960896,82260962);甘肃省青年科技基金计划项目(22JR11RA205);兰州市青年科技人才创新项目(2024-QN-156)


Effects of Electro-scalp Acupuncture on Treating Ischemic Injury in Cortex of Rats with Focal Cerebral Ischemia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨电头针(ESA)对缺血性脑卒中(IS)大鼠皮质区缺血性损伤的治疗作用机制。方法:采用随机数字表法将大鼠分为假手术组、模型组、电头针组、激动剂组、抑制剂组、电头针+抑制剂组各11只,除假手术组外,将其他各组大鼠制备大脑中动脉闭塞(MCAO)模型。造模成功后6 h,电头针组给予电头针治疗,强度1 mA,频率2/100 Hz,30 min/d;激动剂组给予腹腔注射PTEN诱导推定激酶1(PINK1)/人帕金森蛋白2(Parkin)通路激活剂羰基氰化物间氯苯腙(CCCP)溶液4 mg/(kg·d),1次/d;抑制剂组给予腹腔注射Mdivi-1溶液2 mg/(kg·d),1次/d;电头针+抑制剂组给予腹腔注射线粒体分裂抑制剂1(Mitochondrial Division Inhibitor 1,Mdivi-1)溶液并进行ESA疗法干预,30 min/d。各组均连续干预7 d。用神经功能缺损评分(mNSS)评估大鼠神经功能缺损程度;2,3,5-三苯基四氮唑(TTC)染色法测量大鼠脑梗死体积占比;免疫荧光双染技术检测缺血脑组织线粒体外膜转位酶20(TOM20)与微管相关蛋白轻链3(LC3)共定位水平;蛋白质印迹法检测大鼠脑缺血皮质区细胞色素C氧化酶亚基Ⅳ(COX Ⅳ)、PTEN诱导推定激酶1(PINK1)、人帕金森蛋白2(Parkin)的表达。结果:与假手术组比较,模型组大鼠mNSS评分高(P<0.01);与模型组比较,激动剂组、电头针组mNSS评分低(P<0.01),抑制剂组mNSS评分高(P<0.01);与抑制剂组比较,电头针+抑制剂组mNSS评分低(P<0.01);电头针组与激动剂组mNSS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与假手术组比较,模型组大鼠脑梗死体积大(P<0.01);与模型组比较,激动剂组、电头针组、抑制剂组大鼠脑梗死体积小(P<0.01、P<0.05);与抑制剂组比较,电头针+抑制剂组脑梗死体积小(P<0.01);电头针组与激动剂组脑梗死体积比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.01)。与假手术组比较,模型组缺血皮质区TOM20、LC3的共定位水平低(P<0.01);与模型组比较,电头针组、激动剂组TOM20和LC3的共定位水平高(P<0.01),抑制剂组TOM20和LC3的共定位水平低(P<0.01);与抑制剂组比较,电头针+抑制剂组TOM20和LC3的共定位水平高(P<0.01);电头针组与激动剂组TOM20和LC3的共定位比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与假手术组比较,模型组COX Ⅳ表达高(P<0.01);与模型组比较,电头针组、激动剂组COX Ⅳ表达低(P<0.05、P<0.01),抑制剂组COX Ⅳ表达高(P<0.05);与抑制剂组比较,电头针+抑制剂组COX Ⅳ表达低(P<0.01);电头针组与激动剂组COX Ⅳ表达比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与假手术组比较,模型组缺血皮质区PINK1、Parkin蛋白表达低(P<0.01);与模型组比较,电头针组、激动剂组缺血皮质区PINK1、Parkin蛋白表达高(P<0.05、P<0.01),抑制剂组缺血皮质区PINK1、Parkin蛋白表达低(P<0.05);与抑制剂组比较,电头针+抑制剂组缺血皮质区PINK1、Parkin蛋白表达高(P<0.01);电头针组与激动剂组缺血皮质区PINK1、Parkin蛋白表达比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:电头针通过激活PINK1/Parkin信号通路介导的线粒体自噬减轻缺血性脑损伤。

    Abstract:

    To observe the effects of electro-scalp acupuncture(ESA) on treating ischemic injury in the cortex of rats with ischemic stroke(IS).Methods:According to the random number table method,the rats were divided into the sham operation group,model group,ESA group,agonist group,inhibitor group,and ESA+inhibitor group,with 11 rats in each group.Except for the sham operation group,the rats in the remaining groups were employed to build the middle cerebral artery occlusion(MCAO) model.Six hours after successful modeling,the ESA group was treated with ESA with the intensity of 1 mA,and frequency of 2/100 Hz and 30 minutes per day.The agonist group was given intraperitoneal injection of PTEN-induced putative kinase 1(PINK1)/human Parkinson's protein 2(Parkin) pathway activator carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone(CCCP) solution at a dose of 4 mg/(kg·d) once a day.In the inhibitor group,intraperitoneal injection of Mdivi-1 solution was given at a dose of 2 mg/(kg·d) once a day,while the ESA+inhibitor group received intraperitoneal injection of Mdivi-1 solution and ESA therapy intervention for 30 minutes a day.The intervention was conducted in each group for seven consecutive days.Meanwhile,the mNSS method was adopted to assess the degree of neurological defects in rats,and the proportion of cerebral infarction volume in rats was measured by 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride(TTC) staining.The co-localization levels of TOM20 and LC3 in ischemic brain tissue were detected by fluorescence double staining,and the expressions of COX Ⅳ,PINK1,and Parkin in the ischemic cortical region of rats were compared by Western blotting.Results:Compared with the sham operation group,the mNSS score of rats in the model group was high(P<0.01),while compared with the model group,the mNSS scores of the agonist and ESA groups were low(P<0.01),and the mNSS score of the inhibitor group was high(P<0.01).Compared to the inhibitor group,the mNSS score of the ESA+inhibitor group was low(P<0.01).There was no statistically significant difference in mNSS scores between the ESA group and the agonist group(P>0.05).Compared with the sham operation group,the model group had a large cerebral infarction volume(P<0.01),while compared with the model group,the agonist group,ESA group,and inhibitor group had small cerebral infarction volumes in rats(P<0.01,P<0.05).Compared with the inhibitor group,the ESA+inhibitor group had a small cerebral infarction volume(P<0.01),and there was no statistical difference in the cerebral infarction volume between the ESA group and the agonist group(P>0.01).Compared with the sham operation group,the co-localization levels of TOM20 and LC3 in the ischemic cortex of the model group were lower(P<0.01).Compared with the model group,the co-localization levels of TOM20 and LC3 were higher in the ESA group and agonist group(P<0.01),while the co-localization levels of TOM20 and LC3 were lower in the inhibitor group(P<0.01).Compared with the inhibitor group,the co-localization levels of TOM20 and LC3 were higher in the ESA+inhibitor group(P<0.01).There was no statistical difference in the co-localization levels of TOM20 and LC3 between the ESA group and the agonist group(P>0.05).Compared with the sham operation group,the expression level of COX Ⅳ in the model group was high(P<0.01),while compared to the model group,the expression levels of COX Ⅳ in the ESA and agonist groups were low(P<0.05,P<0.01),and the expression of COX Ⅳ in the inhibitor group was high(P<0.05).Compared with the inhibitor group,the expression level of COX Ⅳ in the ESA+inhibitor group was low(P<0.01),with no statistical difference between the expression levels of COX Ⅳ in the ESA group and agonist group(P>0.05).Compared with the sham operation group,the expression of PINK1 and Parkin proteins in the ischemic cortex region of the rats in the model group was low(P<0.01),while compared with the model group,the expression of PINK1 and Parkin proteins in the ischemic cortex region of the rats in the ESA and agonist groups was high(P<0.05,P<0.01),with low expression of PINK1 and Parkin proteins in the ischemic cortex regions of rats in the inhibitor group(P<0.05).Compared with the inhibitor group,the expression levels of PINK1 and Parkin proteins in the ischemic cortex regions of rats in the ESA+inhibitor group were high(P<0.01),with no statistical difference between the expression of PINK1 and Parkin proteins in the ischemic cortex regions of rats in the ESA group and agonist group(P>0.05).Conclusion:ESA can alleviate ischemic brain injury by activating the PINK1/Parkin signaling pathway-mediated mitophagy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

田亮,方晓苓,孙润洁,金钰钧,李兴兰,王金海,杜小正.电头针对局灶性脑缺血大鼠皮质区缺血性损伤的治疗作用机制[J].世界中医药,2025,(07).

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-31
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码