| 引用本文:张 昶1 李 进2 谭 程3 张 怡4 刘赵丽1 廖奕歆1.针刺联合红外光疗仪对比温针灸治疗原发性痛经的临床疗效评价[J].世界中医药,2013,8(06):. |
|
| 针刺联合红外光疗仪对比温针灸治疗原发性痛经的临床疗效评价 |
| Assessment on Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture combined with Infrared Light and Efficacy of Warming Needle Acupuncture for Primary Dysmenorrheal |
| 投稿时间：2013-01-11 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2013.06.025 |
| 中文关键词: 针刺 红外光疗仪 温针灸 原发性痛经 |
| English Keywords:Acupuncture Infrared light Warming-needle moxibustion Primary dysmenorrheal |
| 基金项目:航天中心医院科研项目(编号：KY-201030) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1593 |
| 全文下载次数: 1770 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的:比较针刺联合红外光疗仪与温针灸治疗原发性痛经的临床疗效。方法:64例寒凝血瘀型原发性痛经患者，随机分为治疗组22例、温针灸组22例和对照组20例。从月经前7天开始，3组患者均针刺气海、关元、水道、归来、三阴交、地机，1次/天，直至月经来临。治疗组在留针的同时，接受红外光疗仪照射小腹部；温针灸组在留针的同时，接受温针灸；对照组只接受针刺。1个月经周期为1个疗程，连续治疗3个疗程，随访3个月后评价疗效。结果:3组综合疗效分别为68.18%、63.64%和45.00%；治疗组、温针灸组综合疗效均优于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；治疗组、温针灸组组间比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组、温针灸组治疗后VAS分值均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；治疗组、温针灸组组间比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组、温针灸组治疗后COX痛经症状分值均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；治疗组、温针灸组组间比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:针刺联合红外光疗仪和温针灸均是治疗原发性痛经的有效手段。红外光疗仪以其温控好、易操作、无污染等优点，将具有广大应用前景。 |
| English Summary: |
| To assess the clinical efficacy of acupuncture combined with infrared light and efficacy of warming needle acupuncture for primary dysmenorrheal patients. Methods: Sixty-four patients were randomly divided into treatment group of 22 cases， warming-needle moxibustion group of 22 cases， and control group of 20 patients. From 7 days before menstruation， all patients in 3 groups were acupunctured Qihai(CV6)， Guanyuan(CV4)， Shuidao(ST28)， Guilai(ST29)， Sanyinjiao(SP6)， Diji(SP8)， once a day until onset of menstrual flow. While retaining needle， treatment group received infrared irradiation， and warming-needle moxibustion group received warming-needle moxibustion. Control group only received acupuncture. All patients were treated with 3 menstruation cycles and followed up for 3 months. Results: Overall curative effects of 3 groups were respectively 68.18% and 63.64%，and 45.00%， two treatment groups were significantly superior to that of control group(P<0.05)， and there was no statistical difference between the two treatment groups. Treat groups also showed significantly lower Vas scores， and Cox scores than that of control group (P<0.05)， and the scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Acupuncture combined with infrared light， and warming needle moxibustion are both effective method to treat primary dysmenorrheal. Infrared light will be more widely accepted for such advantages as user-friendliness and zero pollution. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
