| 引用本文:方晨晔 卢 颖 陈 飞 袁 青.“针上灸”法与“温针灸”法临床治疗效应的差异比较[J].世界中医药,2013,8(11):. |
|
| “针上灸”法与“温针灸”法临床治疗效应的差异比较 |
| Comparison of the Clinical Treatment Effect Difference between “Zhen-Shang-jiu” and “Wen-Zhen-jiu” |
| 投稿时间：2013-03-13 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2013.11.027 |
| 中文关键词: “针上灸”法 “温针灸”法 差异 比较 |
| English Keywords:“Zhen-Shang-jiu” The “Wen-Zhen-jiu” Difference Comparison |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1255 |
| 全文下载次数: 4544 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的:通过“针上灸”法与“温针灸”法治疗寒凝血瘀型原发性痛经,来比较“针上灸”法与“温针灸”法临床治疗效应的差异。方法:将患者随机分为“针上灸”组和“温针灸”组,采取相应的治疗,并进行观察。结果:“针上灸”组与“温针灸”组总有效率分别为94.44%、82.86%,通过χ2检验分析,2组总有效率之间没有显著的差异(P>0.05);比较2组治疗前后的疼痛积分数据,“针上灸”法的近期疗效要优于“温针灸”法,随访结果显示2种方法的远期疗效都有待提高。结论:“针上灸”法与“温针灸”法临床疗效确切,但前者温热效应更快速,可控性更好;可以充分发挥艾灸时艾油的作用;能最大限度避免出现患者被烫伤和烧坏床单的事故,使患者能以放松的体态和心态接受治疗,达到“两神合一”的最佳治疗效果。 |
| English Summary: |
| To compare the clinical efficacy between “Zhen-Shang-jiu” and “Wen-Zhen-jiu” through the treating cold coagulation of blood stasis dysmenorrhea. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into the “Zhen-Shang-jiu” group and the “Wen-Zhen-jiu” group to perform appropriate treatment. Curative effects were observed afterwards. Results: The total efficiency of the “Zhen-Shang-jiu” group was 94.44%, and the “Wen-Zhen-jiu” group 82.86%. Through χ2 test analysis, two groups had no significant difference in terms of efficiency (P>0.05). Comparing the pain score data of two groups before and after the treatment, “Zhen-Shang-jiu” group's efficacy was better than that of the “Wen-Zhen-jiu” group. Long-term efficacy of the two methods is yet to be improved. Conclusion: Both “Zhen-Shang-jiu” and “Wen-Zhen-jiu” show clinical efficacy, but the former: 1) has a faster warm effect and is easy to manipulate; 2) gives full play to moxa and moxibustion oil; 3) avoids patients or bed sheets to get burnt to the greatest degree possible, so that patients can always have the best therapeutic effect by relaxing completely. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
