| 引用本文:张 肇 宇.中药舒鼻喷剂与西药鼻喷剂治疗过敏性鼻炎31例临床观察[J].世界中医药,2014,9(01):. |
|
| 中药舒鼻喷剂与西药鼻喷剂治疗过敏性鼻炎31例临床观察 |
| Clinical Observation of 31 Allergic Rhinitis Patients treated by TCM Shubi Spray and Western Medicine Nasal Spray |
| 投稿时间：2013-09-28 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2014.01.016 |
| 中文关键词: 过敏性鼻炎 中医药疗法 舒鼻喷剂 |
| English Keywords:Allergic Rhinitis TCM therapy Shubi Spray |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1570 |
| 全文下载次数: 2337 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：通过观察中药鼻喷剂与西药鼻喷剂对于治疗过敏性鼻炎的疗效比较，探讨中药鼻喷剂的临床应用价值。方法：选取过敏性鼻炎患者共31例，采用单盲试验，用外观相同的喷罐分别装入中药鼻喷剂及西药鼻喷剂，给予受试者，嘱咐受试者固定一个鼻孔喷中药液，另一个鼻孔喷西药液，每天3次。1周回诊检查1次，实验时间共计两周。检查方法分两部分：鼻腔摄影记录，填写疗效评估表。结果：本次观察病例共31例，有3例失联或中途放弃，共实际观察28例。中药喷剂疗效优于西药喷剂供16例，占57%。中药喷剂疗效等同西药喷剂共7例，占25%。中药喷剂疗效劣于西药喷剂共2例，占7%。中药喷剂无效者共3例，占11%。西药有11例无效，占39%。鼻腔摄影显示中药喷剂经两周持续使用后，无1例出现不良反应。结论：中药鼻喷剂治疗过敏性鼻炎疗效确切，而且无不良反应出现，具有良好的临床应用价值。 |
| English Summary: |
| To compare the treatment effect between Levocabsitine and Shubi Spray for the allergic rhinitis， and investigate the clinical application value of TCM nasal spray.Methods：Thirty-one patients were participated in the single-blind study， each patient was given one bottle of Shubi Spray and one bottle of Levocabsitine， each was used for one nasal cavity， 3 times a day， 2 weeks.At end of each week we used micro-camera to observe the nasal mucosa.Results：3 patients lost to follow up or withdrew the study prematurely， 28 patients completed the study.16 patients reported superior efficacy of Shubi Spray to Levocabistine (57%).7 patients reported no significant difference of Shubi Spray and Levocabistine (25%).2 patients reported inferior efficacy of Shubi Spray to Levocabistine (7%).3 patients felt the Shubi Spray have no effect (11%)， compared to 11 patients who felt levocabstine have no effect (39%).No adverse reaction was observed or reported.Conclusion：The Shubi Spray was effective for relieving clinical symptoms of allergic rhinitis， and its safety was assured， therefore it has good clinical application prospect. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
