| 引用本文:王家莹1，王俊峰2，商洪才3，4.Spin—中医药临床证据报告的新挑战[J].世界中医药,2017,(06):. |
|
| Spin—中医药临床证据报告的新挑战 |
| Spin:The New Challenge of the Reporting of Chinese Medicine’s Clinical Evidence |
| 投稿时间：2017-05-10 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2017.06.008 |
| 中文关键词: Spin 中医临床证据 报告规范 |
| English Keywords:Spin Clinical evidence of traditional Chinese medicine Reporting standard |
| 基金项目:第二批国家“万人计划”（编号：W02020052） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1392 |
| 全文下载次数: 1556 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 随着各类临床证据不断涌现，各类证据报告规范工具相继被开发，对报告的规范和透明度有不同程度的提高，但研究者依然对临床证据报告的内容和语言使用有很大自由度，常对研究结果进行粉饰和曲解，这一现象引起广泛关注，中医临床证据的报告也未能豁免。本文回顾了多年来国外相关研究，详细介绍这些误导性报告（Spin）的概念、现状、识别和分类，以期为今后中医药临床证据中Spin的研究提供思路与方法。 |
| English Summary: |
| As various kinds of clinical evidence emerges, reporting quality tools of all kinds of evidence have been developed. They improved the quality and transparency to some extent, but researchers still have a large degree of freedom to choose how and what to be reported, and usually they distorted the research results consciously or unconsciously, which gradually draws a lot of attention. The reporting of clinical evidence of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） is also in the face of challenges alike. This article reviewed all related researches abroad, and introduced the concept, present situation, identification and classification of these misleading reports （Spin）, hoping to provide some ideas and methods for the Spin research in the field of clinical evidence of TCM in the future. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
