引用本文:陈瀚宇.刘完素李东垣火热证认识之异同[J].世界中医药,2018,(05):. |
|
刘完素李东垣火热证认识之异同 |
Similarities and Differences of Fire Heat Syndrome by Liu Wansu and Li Dongyuan |
投稿时间:2017-06-07 |
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2018.05.012 |
中文关键词: 刘完素 李东垣 脾胃 内伤肌热 湿热 泻痢 消渴 宣通气液 |
English Keywords:Liu Wansu Li Dongyuan Spleen and stomach Internal damage of muscle heat Diarrhea Diabetes Diffuse and smooth qi and fluid |
基金项目:中国中医科学院广安门医院学科培育基金项目(2009S217) |
|
摘要点击次数: 975 |
全文下载次数: 1460 |
中文摘要: |
本文通过对刘完素和李东垣2位医家在脾胃病火热证的认识进行比较,二者对脾胃病火热证论述各有侧重,刘完素偏重六气火化致病,治宜开达玄府,宣通气液;李东垣注重脾胃内伤,治疗多补中益气、升阳散火。从而增加我们对脾胃病火热证的进一步认识,为以后的临床提供治疗思路。 |
English Summary: |
This paper compared the understandings of fire heat syndrome in spleen and stomach disease by Liu Wansu and Li Dongyuan. Both of them have different emphasis on fire heat syndrome in spleen and stomach disease. Liu Wansu thought that transformation of six qi into fire caused disease, and the treatment should open sweat pores, diffuse and smooth qi and fluid. Li Dongyuan thought the internal damage of spleen and stomach caused the disease, and the treatment should supplement the center and boost qi, raise yang and dissipate fire. These will increase our understanding of fire heat syndrome of spleen and stomach disease, so as to provide treatment ideas in clinical practice. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |