| 引用本文:胡秋兰1，王丽伟1，黄丽军1，刘步平1，周颖芳2.火针治疗肱骨外上髁炎的Meta分析[J].世界中医药,2018,(12):. |
|
| 火针治疗肱骨外上髁炎的Meta分析 |
| Meta analysis on Fire Needle for Treating Lateral Epicondylitis |
| 投稿时间：2017-01-10 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2018.12.063 |
| 中文关键词: 火针 肱骨外上髁炎 随机对照试验 Meta分析 |
| English Keywords:Fire Needle Lateral Epicondylitis RCT Meta analysis |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（81403488） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 784 |
| 全文下载次数: 681 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：评价火针治疗肱骨外上髁炎的有效性和安全性。方法：检索中国知网（CNKI）、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库（VIP）、万方医药期刊数据库（WF）、中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）及Pubmed，搜集火针治疗肱骨外上髁炎的随机对照试验，检索时限均为从建库至2016年10月22日。用RevMan5.3进行Meta分析。结果：纳入文献6篇，其中仅1篇报道不良反应及病例脱落，累计纳入病例516例（观察组264例、对照组252例）；在治愈率及改善VAS评分方面，火针较其他针灸治疗、火针+其他针灸治疗较其他针灸或局部泼尼松封闭治疗有明显优势（P<0.05或P<0.01）；在总有效率方面，火针与其他针灸治疗无显著差异（P>0.05），火针+其他针灸治疗优于其他针灸治疗或局部泼尼松封闭（P<0.05或P<0.01）。结论：火针单用或联合其他针灸方法治疗肱骨外上髁炎有疗效优势，安全性较好，值得推广。 |
| English Summary: |
| To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fire needle to treat lateral epicondylitis.Methods:Clinical articles in CNKI,VIP,WF,CBM and Pubmed were electronically searched from the day of database set up to October 22,2016.Collect and select relevant RCTs which report the effectiveness of fire needle in treating lateral epicondylitis.Analyze the final data by Meta analysis with RevMan5.3 Meta analysis software.Results:Six references were included.Off cases and adverse reactions were reported in 1 article.516 cases can be included (264 cases in the experiment group and 252 cases in the control group).Compared with other acupuncture therapies,fire needle therapy,fire needle combined are more effective than other acupuncture,especially in the aspects of cure rate and decreasing VAS score(P<0.05 or P<0.01).However,differences were not significant in the aspect oftotal effective rate (P>0.05).Conclusion:Fire needle or fire needle compared with other therapies in treating lateral epicondylitis have obvious advantages.It is safe and worthy of promotion. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
